Comments for Our vote: Reilly, Stone, Symons, yes, yes, yes at http://pressbanner.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments http://pressbanner.com Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:39:23 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://pressbanner.com/content/view/1214/41/#comment-1197 They got it wrong on Measure S. And thank the lord Sprenger was not taken seriously. What a mess. - Bryan Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:13:20 +0100 http://pressbanner.com/content/view/1214/41/#comment-890 If you are going to opt for one of the two challengers, Smith makes more sense. Stewart is a bit of a loose cannon and seems to have a narrower focus on issues. David Smith knows how the county works, understands the process and he's not beholden to special interests or insiders like Stone is. At the COPA forum, Stone kissed major patootie. Then he turns around and does the same thing with the Sierra Club....whose interests are in polar opposition to COPA. Stone is not in line with his constituents. He's in line with whoever he is talking to at the moment. - FBO Wed, 14 May 2008 12:52:41 +0100 http://pressbanner.com/content/view/1214/41/#comment-887 Stone endorsed the project in the paper some time ago, without qualification. Since then, he's been feeling the pressure of the citizens movement. And since he perceives that it is largely an environmental protest, he found a hiding place behind the EIR results. That provides some cover until June 3rd. I got a glossy brochure from his campaign today that points attention to his environmental committee. Huh? Where have they been? I think he would like to can the project but the special interests won't let him. Its risky. Even the local social planners are divided on this. The project cannot help him with the local electorate but it may turn out to be an good investment with the special interests, since he is proving that he will do what he's told. Smith or Stewart are better choices for the San Lorenzo Valley, you know where they stand. Getting Scotts Valley is hard because its Stone's home town. And I'm not seeing signs and advertising for the two challengers. It will be interesting to see the results broken down by precinct. I'm voting against Stone in hopes of seeing this dragged out to November. The debate is healthy. one. - slackjaw Tue, 13 May 2008 23:04:37 +0100 http://pressbanner.com/content/view/1214/41/#comment-879 I don't think Stone was in on it from the beginning. He cluelessly inherited it when he arrived on the scene. Unfortunately, he continues to cluelessly advocate for it behind the scenes while pretending to be waiting for an EIR in public. The Sprenger comments are ridiculous. - Andrea Sanchez Tue, 13 May 2008 06:26:58 +0100 http://pressbanner.com/content/view/1214/41/#comment-878 It was supposed to say 50% plus one, but the web page won't all a plus sign. - Alvin Vanne Tue, 13 May 2008 00:56:38 +0100 http://pressbanner.com/content/view/1214/41/#comment-877 Stone pretends to be out of the loop when it comes to that 55 Unit Over-development proposed for the lovely meadow in Felton. He is not; he was in on the plan from the beginning. I am going to vote for someone else, in hopes that Stone does not get 50% 1 in June. - Alvin Vanne Tue, 13 May 2008 00:55:36 +0100