<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Cal-Am hits Felton</title>
		<description>Comments for Cal-Am hits Felton at http://pressbanner.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://pressbanner.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:02:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://pressbanner.com/content/view/593/42/#comment-320</link>
			<description>FLOW fought the Monterey link rate cut tooth and nail. If rates had only risen 14% as the Monterey link would have allowed, it would have deflated FLOW's bogus claims of concern over rates. Also bogus claims that SLVWD had lower rates. Thanks to FLOW rates are high now and will be higher if SLVWD takes over. - Lynnette</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:19:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://pressbanner.com/content/view/593/42/#comment-291</link>
			<description>If FLOW were honest (which they are not) they would have fought for Cal Am to link with Monterey. Our rates would have been lower. They also would have fought for real LOCAL control instead of GIVING the water company to their buddies at San Lorenzo Valley Water District. 

FLOW lied, Cal Am charges too much. SLV Water District is just going to rip us off as well.

We should have fought for FELTON ownership of the water system.  - Bill</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:35:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
