Google

Press Banner Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
City needs Target tax PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Press Banner Letters |   
Friday, 09 May 2008

 

A letter to the editor from Stephen Walpole, a retired chief of police in Scotts Valley

 


EDITOR,

 

For more than three decades I’ve had the distinct pleasure of living and working in the city of Scotts Valley. Before my retirement, I was a member of the city’s management team (20 years) and held the positions of interim city manager and chief of police. I believe my history with the city gives me a unique insight into its finances, policing issues and planning process. I would like to go on record as being in favor of Target locating in Scotts Valley.

This city was incorporated (by its new citizens in 1966) as a no-tax city, which meant that its primary source of revenue would come from sales tax for its general fund. This meant that through the planning process, commercial areas would have to be identified and developed. The city did implement a small property tax, which was later cut in half via Proposition 13.

Over many years, our citizens have made their feelings quite clear in regards to taxes, which is “no new taxes.” As an example, it took 30-plus years for a tax to be voted in to improve Scotts Valley Drive. Through the years, taxes that were voted in had a sunset clause attached to them, hoping that sales tax would  catch up to fill in the void. We now have a tax in place that will sunset.

Substantial sales tax increases can only come from new development or new business moving in.

I’m quite confident that your chief of police will study this project thoroughly and make recommendations to mitigate any policing issues in regards to calls, crimes and traffic. Additionally, past city councils have implement police impact fees on all new development. Public safety has always been a high priority for our City Council, and you can rest assured they will make it continue to be so.
We need new sales tax to maintain this great city that I have been privileged to work for and raise my family in. I would be remiss not to thank its’ citizen for all the support they have given me throughout the years!

Stephen Walpole, retired chief of police, Scotts Valley

Comments (2)Add Comment
Target would be a tax
written by Frank Z. Kertai, May 13, 2008
The chief makes the same error that other city leaders have made on this issue. The economics of Target simply make no sense for this city. There are costs associated with the potential sales tax revenue of this proposed project. When you look at the total picture, Target would be a net negative revenue proposition for both the local economy and our local government.

In addition to crime impacts on our citizens and city services, the infrastructure costs of supporting a 155,000 sq. ft. big-box store exceed the benefits. The traffic impacts on Mt. Hermon Road, already the third highest traveled route in the county, would be in excess of an additional 9,100 car trips per day. The proposed Target site on La Madrona Drive is unacceptable. This is the primary route for many families and their children going to and from local schools. Peak shopping hours overlap with children leaving school to go home.

The Target Shopping Center would also be a destination shopping experience. In addition to cloths and knick-knacks, Target would sell groceries, have a coffee shop and restaurants. There would be no incentive, or need, for shoppers to go into downtown Scotts Valley to visit other businesses.

The planned Town-Center project will add another 174,000 sq. ft. of retail space to the Mt. Herman Road corridor. The Target Shopping Center would have a negative economic impact on this project as well.

What this city needs is the kind of leadership that understands you have to look at both sides of the economic equation (income and expense) and the wisdom to know what appropriate development for the City of Scotts Valley is. The city does not need a Target tax.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
If the City of Scotts Valley needs money, then why not tax us directly?
written by Tim Hawkins, May 13, 2008
I'm a 20 year resident of Scotts Valley; and understand the need for taxes to pay for services provided to the community. I would first recommend that the city look at their budget to determine the one department that consumes 50% of the expeneses; that would be the Police Department. Which I understand goes thru $3,000,000 each year. That's a lot of money for this small town. While I certainly believe the PD does a great job of keeping us all in line (read protected), it seems that the expense might be a bit exessive. Once that review is complete, and to the satisfaction of the residents of Scotts Valley -- then how about taxing us directly? The city benefits, and the people benefit.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

busy