Castle Rock among 70 state parks scheduled for closure
by Peter Burke
May 27, 2011 | 2899 views | 3 3 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
At Castle Rock State Park, Prunedale's Josh Alfaro assists Livermoore climber Aaron Parker during their trip to the natural tourist attraction. Lucjan Szewczyk/Press-Banner
At Castle Rock State Park, Prunedale's Josh Alfaro assists Livermoore climber Aaron Parker during their trip to the natural tourist attraction. Lucjan Szewczyk/Press-Banner
slideshow
Campbell's Allan Hart walks on one of Castle Rock State Park's trails. He's planning a trek from it all the way to Big Basin State Park in Boulder Creek - a tow-day, one night hike. Lucjan Szewczyk/Press-Banner
Campbell's Allan Hart walks on one of Castle Rock State Park's trails. He's planning a trek from it all the way to Big Basin State Park in Boulder Creek - a tow-day, one night hike. Lucjan Szewczyk/Press-Banner
slideshow
Castle Rock State Park — 5,125 rural acres with 32 miles of hiking and horseback riding trails north of Boulder Creek — is one of 70 California state parks slated for closure in the next several years.

State parks officials announced the closures May 13 as the necessary remedy to reduce the department’s $300 million budget by $11 million during the 2011-12 fiscal year and $22 million the following year, as mandated by Assembly Bill 95, which was signed into law in March.

“We regret closing any park,” said Ruth Coleman, director of California State Parks, in a prepared statement. “But with the proposed budget reductions over the next two years, we can no longer afford to operate all parks within the system.”

In Santa Cruz County, Castle Rock State Park, Twin Lakes and Seabright state beaches, Santa Cruz Missions Historical State Park and Schwann Lagoon State Park will close within the next two years.

Castle Rock will be put into “caretaker status,” said acting Mountain Sector Superintendent Sheila Branon, meaning that instead of having a full-time ranger in the park, there will be regular patrols through park by rangers stationed elsewhere — most likely from nearby Big Basin Redwoods State Park.

“We’ve never closed state parks before in California, so this is new to us,” Branon said. “All parks are different. Castle Rock is so porous, so there’s no way to physically close the park.”

The parks department plans to make sure the park remains safe and will watch for the likes of illegal fires and graffiti.

Branon said revenue and attendance were part of the formula used to determine which parks would close. Castle Rock’s annual revenue was $46,300 in 2008-09, and the park lost $114,000. Attendance that year was just over 82,600.

“They haven’t set a date for closing trail camps,” Branon said of the popular backpacking spot. “We’re predicting after next spring.”

Coleman said the parks system will seek partners among cities, counties and nonprofits to continue to operate the parks, despite the removal of state funding.

The closures come after Proposition 21 — an $18 vehicle license surcharge that would have raised $500 million per year for the parks — failed at the polls in November.

The measure failed statewide, despite 68 percent approval in Santa Cruz County.

It’s a sad day for state parks and the recreating public,” Branen said. “Everyone’s upset about this. We’re hoping something changes.”

Groups that support state parks also regret the news.

“Even though we’ve been preparing for this news, it’s a very sad day for California,” said Bonny Hawley, the executive director of Friends of Santa Cruz State Parks, in a statement. “We’re especially disappointed to see local treasures on the list. … We should be asking, ‘Is this the kind of state we want to be living in?’ Until we have a better answer to that question, Friends of Santa Cruz State Parks is prepared to step up in new ways to save these parks and beaches for future generations, as they were saved for us.”

The Mountain Parks Foundation, www.mountainparks.org, is an avenue that park lovers can use to donate to help support programs in the parks.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Janna Brock
|
May 31, 2011
It's frustrating to hear the dialogue go against "illegals" and "hispanics". The real problems are the short-sighted characters you elect to make policy for the cities and counties of Santa Cruz. They have made of mess of everything they have touched and been directly responsible for the financial mess and loss of public safety we are all experiencing today.

Next election - no incumbents. No clueless, self-serving politicians like the ones in office now.
Biggest Cons I know
|
May 30, 2011
fled the country sticking taxpayers with his illegitimate kids bills. Hides his business income so not to pay taxes. Other is retired cop that only uses illegals to do work, in fear real business might pay taxes that support his income. Not funny any more.
Felton Resident
|
May 30, 2011
"Illegal Immigration Costs California Over Ten Billion Annually"

Thank your liberal community and their elected politicians. They would never consider cutting benefits to illegals (hispanic vote), but claim that all cuts have to come from schools, fire, police, libraries, and parks--where the conservatives (bill payers) are most sensitive.


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.