Scotts Valley passes slimmed budget
by Press-Banner
Jun 24, 2010 | 942 views | 4 4 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Scotts Valley City Council passed a budget with roughly $300,000 in cuts to the general fund last week as the city prepares for the expiration of Measure C, a quarter-cent sales tax, in 2011.

The city was able to evade new layoffs and furloughs for the coming fiscal year.

Spending from the city’s general fund is slated to decrease from $8.27 million in 2009-10 to $7.93 million in 2010-11.

“With this budget, we’ve taken our belt in another notch, but I’m not sure we can go any further without severely impacting the services we offer,” Mayor Jim Reed said. “Until we know the outcome of things like the Town Center and the lawsuit with the county, we’ve got to keep things unusually lean and mean.”

City Manager Steve Ando said the city has enough money in reserve to last through 2013 without new significant income or a dramatic drop in revenue.

At the June 2 City Council meeting, city leaders discussed cutting at least one job at the senior center and having employees in the recreation division manage the center.

Ando said eliminating the senior center job would save the general fund budget about $50,000 a year.

However, at the June 16 meeting, the council approved hiring a part-time position in order to keep senior programs running at the center. There may still be changes to the senior center schedule.

Senior center board president Ferd Bergholz thanked the council for compromising on the part-time position.

“I’m glad city staff and the council is supportive of finding a way to make this next year easier,” Bergholz said.

This budget is the last that will include income from Measure C, a quarter-cent sales tax that is expected to contribute about $500,000 to the city’s general fund in the coming year.

Future discussions are expected to focus on how to make up the lost Measure C money after council members declined to put it back on the ballot before voters last spring.

United Way of Santa Cruz County requested $5,000 for a 2-1-1 hotline, a number to dial for social services that soon will expand to Santa Cruz County.

Earlier this year, city leaders declined to commit to the funds because of tough economic times. But on Wednesday, June 23, they agreed on a 4-1 vote to give $1,200 to the service, which begins this summer. Vice Mayor Dene Bustichi dissented.

“There are some emergencies that cannot be categorized and people still need answers, and it can be difficult to navigate where to go,” Councilman Randy Johnson said. “I think it’s important that we have an alternate route for people to pursue. A 2-1-1 service really does fulfill a need in this community.”
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Loves SV Dollars
|
June 29, 2010
Is back calling taxpayers whiners (10%). SV will be paying for that one for too many years. Rejoin the county, and get rid of the royalty and their castle on the hill. Tell me again why we need our own police and fire departments. Police and Fire will bankrupt the city for the next 40 years.
Deeper cuts
|
June 29, 2010
Regertably deeper cuts simply woun't be enough. The City is currently (with measure C in place today) running an annual deficit of $500k per year. Next year when measure C expires the annual deficcit will balloon to close to a million per year. The loss of Seagate revenue will further increase the deficts. So tell us all what additional cots the City is able to make to cover a million dollar a year shortfall? We are in this mess because the current City Council members increased the annual general fund budget by $1,000,000 per year mostly with pay raises three years ago. They have tried to cut back but even the City Manager Steve Ando is on record stating that without a new source of funding the City will be out of money in 2-3 years. A renewal of measure C at the 1/4% level would provide $500,000 in tax revenue per year and even with this renewal further cuts will need to be made. I can't see you objection to a 25 cent tax on a $100 dollar retail purchase. If you have a better idea lets hear it.
Disagree
|
June 28, 2010
The city doesn't need the sales tax, it simply needs to cut back its spending a little bit, as it is doing. When times are lean, cut back, when prosperous, spend away. A city should not be hoarding taxpayer money in hefty savings accounts, nor should it be overspending and running into the red. Honestly, it seems like the city has managed its money correctly. We are two years into a major recession and we've hardly felt any impact in terms of city run services. Keep whining if you want "Throw the bums out", but its hard to fathom a better situation when the economy has been so bad.

Throw the bums out
|
June 25, 2010
Now tell us again why Mayor Reed, Vice Mayor Bustichi, previous Mayor Johnson and Donna Reed each voted against allowing the voters in November to decide if we needed to renew measure C. These bums are running the city in the red, spending with borrowed money and new bonds just to stay afloat and apparently doing little to stop or stem existing businesses from leaving town (Seagate for example). All this at the same time the City Manage projects the City of Scotts Valley could run out of money within three years. Tell us again why the voters shouldn't have been given an opportunity to vote on a renewal of the 1/4 sales tax in November. Oh I remember why! They were afraid they would be voted out if everyone knew how poorly they were managing the tax payer money. Throw the bums out and teach them a lesson.


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.