Stop Measure C
by Jay Mosley
Sep 23, 2010 | 966 views | 2 2 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

In 2005, voters took on the commitment of a sales tax increase through Measure C to overcome a financial threat to city services. Scotts Valley voters embraced the tax increase, knowing that it was best for the well-being of the city and that this increase was temporary. The proponents of the Measure C extension have not convinced four out of five City Council members that there is a need to ask the voters to continue to pay a tax that is not justified. The city of Scotts Valley has between $2 million and $2.5 million in general reserve funds, revenues coming from redevelopment agency loan repayments and a judgment in favor of the city of Scotts Valley to be reimbursed about $3 million.

In this tough economic downturn, individuals, families and businesses have been forced to tighten their belts to make ends meet, and I expect our local, state and federal governments to do the same. Measure C has run its course and achieved the goal it was intended for. The citizens and businesses of the city have fulfilled their commitment to Measure C. It is unfair to the voters to cry wolf and ask for an extension of this tax when no imminent threat exists.

Our focus needs to be placed on the schools of Scotts Valley, which are facing detrimental budget cuts. I urge citizens and businesses of Scotts Valley to not sign the petition being circulated. Councilwoman Stephany Aguilar has an opportunity to preserve the integrity of past, present and future City Councils by allowing this tax to expire.

Jay Mosley, Scotts Valley

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
WinchesterMoveBack
|
September 27, 2010
I don't even notice it. It doesn't bother me. If it's not needed then keep it going but give the money to the schools. I'm fine with that.

Cut the budget
|
September 23, 2010
While no one wants a new tax or in this case a current tax we have to be realistic. The City Council is currently spending more than $500,000 then the general fund takes in per year. If measure C expires the City will be losing more than $1,000,000 than it takes in each year. I doubt anyone or any business will see any negative impact of a tax that equates to just 25 cents on a $100 dollar purchase but if measure C expires the general fund reserves will list only 2 1/2 years. At that point the City Council will have spent the City broke. No one likes taxes but when the Mayor tells us that this tax, a tax which he originally sponsored, isn't needed he is telling us this as a politician. We need people who will tell us the truth we don't need politicians at this point we need leaders. If Mayor Reed doesn't want to renew his tax then he needs to be man enough to propose and vote for budget reductions from $7.8 million per year to $6.8 million to balance the budget. Mayor Reed where do you propose we should cut to remove $1,000,000 from the City budget?


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.