Commentary: Open dialogue about Gateway South development

EDITOR,
With the end of Target, we need to have open dialogue and discussion, like the proposed Town Center and other city projects, which include neighboring residents and businesses who will feel the most impact of whatever is eventually developed there.
I am calling for the City Council to show leadership and open that dialogue before enabling another big-box development to roll over the city. No matter what sign you hang, the objections remain that a development with a similar footprint is inappropriate.
Changing the name on the application, if allowed, shows evidence of the council’s preference for this kind of development. I am only saddened that it was Target, not the council, which made this decision.
Still, there is opportunity for council members to redeem themselves and treat everyone, north and south Scotts Valley, with the same respect when looking at how and where to develop.
Let the discussion about the types of businesses that would coexist with the Hilton and be appropriate for the Gateway South entrance begin.
The SEIR must accompany this application with the Target moniker, then rest in peace. It’s paid for, and the city already showed that it will continue on its path, as Mayor Randy Johnson has indicated, because the “city has the responsibility” to process each application.
Council members do not, however, have the voter mandate to change the wording as they sees fit. Collectively, we say “no, thank you.”
It’s time for the council members to show us what they have in mind for the future of Scotts Valley and use the wisdom of area residents to help frame decisions in responsible development.
Quality of life is worth more than tax dollars. Please contact the council and ask for an open process. Put Title II out of the big-box racket and send them packing if they insist on this type of irresponsible development.