Letter: Fireworks are dangerous, unnecessary expense

EDITOR,
As a resident of Scotts Valley, I think it’s an unwise and flagrant expense for a city-sponsored fireworks show. Considering the state of our economy, our unemployment rate and the needs in general of our poor, our civic leaders should reconsider their priorities, even if, as I have heard, that money was received by private donation to pay for this event. It seems to me that money can be used for a better purpose — for instance, Second Harvest Food Bank, etc.
In addition, if you consider the raging forest fires two years ago, isn’t it obvious that we live in a beautiful paradise that could be easily destroyed by a stray spark?
Has anyone in the city government considered the fact that their sponsorship of this event implies an endorsement that it’s OK to light fireworks in Scotts Valley? Seems to me this gives those of a mind to be reckless with their own fireworks the will to do so, which increases the likelihood of a dangerous fire.
If these aren’t enough reasons to consider canceling the fireworks show, think of all the people and animals frightened by the noise from this type of event.
Our civic leaders will respond that more revenue is generated by this event than money spent, but I believe that it is the appearance of extravagance and disregard for safety that should be considered. A parade involving young and old alike should be enough to give the citizens of Scotts Valley an opportunity to express their patriotic spirit to celebrate the birth of our nation’s independence.
I wonder why most of the other major cities in our region have opted not to have fireworks.
Darlene Fitts, Scotts Valley